Skip to main content

BJP-led Karnataka Government Supports Prosecution of Husband for Marital Rape



In a surprise move, the Karnataka government has lent support to the prosecution of a husband for the rape of his wife. In an affidavit filed at the Supreme Court, the state government said, “The High Court of Karnataka has considered all the questions of law involved in the present petition and it does not require any interference by this Court.”

This is a significant development because, in an earlier case of a similar kind challenging exception 2 to Section 375 IPC, filed before the Delhi High Court, the BJP-led Central Government had refrained from taking a clear stand on criminalizing marital rape.

Earlier, the Karnataka High Court refused to quash the FIR for marital rape on the ground that it falls under exception 2 to section 375. Pronouncing the accused guilty a single bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna observed that exception 2 to Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, which exempts a husband from the offence of rape against his wife ‘is not absolute…a man is a man; an act is an act; rape is rape’, he said. The High Court further observed that this immunity is not meant to be a license for the commission of crimes.

Following the guilty verdict, the aggrieved husband filed a special leave petition before the Supreme Court. In response to it, a Supreme Court bench comprising the former Chief Justice of India NV Ramana, Justice Krishna Murari and Justice Hima Kohli passed an ad-interim stay order on the High Court judgment.

The affidavit filed by the State government has backed the Karnataka High Court’s decision to refuse the quashing of the FIR. It stated that whether the charge holds on or not is a matter of trial, but based on the facts and circumstances of the case there is no reason to absolve the accused merely on the ground that IPC provides immunity against marital rape.

Even though the judgment refrained from making any pronouncement on the constitutionality of marital rape exemption, the state government in its affidavit made a reference to the recommendations of the JS Verma committee that proposed some amendments to the Criminal law. Among its many suggestions, it proposed the removal of the exception of marital rape and recommended that the law must "specify that a marital or other relationship between the perpetrator or victim is not a valid defence against the crimes of rape or sexual violation".

Seeking dismissal of the husband’s challenge against the High Court’s verdict, the State Government’s affidavit averred, “The High Court of Karnataka has considered all the questions of law involved in the present petition and it does not require any interference by the Supreme Court.”

The Supreme Court is expected to take up this matter in conjunction with the petitions challenging the Delhi High Court’s split verdict in the pleas to criminalize marital rape.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

AV Dicey and the Concept of the Rule of Law in India

  The concept of the rule of law is an integral component of the modern constitutional form of government. It is impossible to conceive of democracy and constitutionalism without it. Rule of law is a natural corollary and animation of the natural rights of humans. The rule of law has generally been understood as encompassing the following three aspects: 1.      Paramountcy of the law 2.      Equality before the law 3.      The predominance of a legal spirit. Within Indian Constitution, the spirit of the rule of law is represented by Article 14 which has been given the status of a fundamental right. Rule of law is neither a ‘rule’ nor a ‘law’, but rather a doctrine of ‘state political morality’ that strives to find the right balance between the ‘powers’ of the state, and the ‘rights’ of individuals. It expresses the aspiration common to all free societies to be ruled by laws, rather than powerful men. The term...

Law of Wills in India: An overview

  What is a Will? An Overview The Indian Succession Act is the law governing wills. It applies to almost all Indians except Muslims. A Will is a legal declaration made by a person regarding the distribution of his assets after his death. (Section 2 (h) of the Indian Succession Act.) Codicil- Sometimes the testator may draft an additional instrument to explain, alter or add to the contents of his will, such documents are referred to as codicils. Legally, a codicil is a part of the will. A Privileged Will is a special kind of will that becomes relevant only during a war, or in cases wherein soldiers are engaged in active combat duty. What kind of assets can be bequeathed through a Will? All kinds of movable and immovable assets including real estate, money deposited in banks, securities, and even brand names, trademarks, and Intellectual Property Rights. Even though a will is a legal document, there is no prescribed format for it. It could be handwritten or typed. A...

Section 53 (Transfer of Property Act), Fraudulent Transfer: A Brief Overview

  Section 53 (Transfer of Property Act), Fraudulent Transfer: A Brief Overview Bare Law: Fraudulent transfer.— Every transfer of immoveable property made with intent to defeat or delay the creditors of the transferor shall be voidable at the option of any creditor so defeated or delayed. Nothing in this sub-section shall impair the rights of a transferee in good faith and for consideration. Nothing in this sub-section shall affect any law for the time being in force relating to insolvency. A suit instituted by a creditor (which term includes a decree-holder whether he has or has not applied for execution of his decree) to avoid a transfer on the ground that it has been made with intent to defeat or delay the creditors of the transferor shall be instituted on behalf of, or for the benefit of, all the creditors. Every transfer of immoveable property made without consideration with intent to defraud a subsequent transferee shall be voidable at the option of such transferee. For the pu...